As a professional climber, that's the question you always get: Why, why, why? It's an ineffable thing; you can't describe it.
We're close friends - the American people, the Israeli people, our governments. There's absolutely no daylight - none - between us and the Israelis on the question of Israel's security.
It is an interesting question how far men would retain their relative rank if they were divested of their clothes.
A hundred years ago, of course, the question that the German Composers' Co-operative asked itself sounded a lot more fundamental: How do you create a fair share for those who ensure that works can actually be performed at all?
Whether that coherence obtains universally is a question that need not be answered here since only those parts where the coherence has actually been found become part of Science.
Basically, on the question of Europe, I want to see a social Europe, a cohesive Europe, a coherent Europe, not a free market Europe.
The question is always 'What is the role of a labor movement?' How much is about collective bargaining, how much is about social change for all workers?
There's no question that Ben Shapiro loves to provoke college students.
When a newspaper columnist wants to write about a novel, the rule is that you're supposed to have a 'hook,' an excuse, a timely reason to bring up the book in question.
As a press secretary and on 'The Five,' I've learned that I have a choice in how I answer a question. There's combative or productive - I get to take my pick.
The question really is, are you improving the world? And you can do that in many models. You can do that in government, you can do that in a nonprofit, and you can do it in commercial enterprise.
No decisions should ever be made without asking the question, is this for the common good?
Don't go around asking the question, 'Is this character likeable?' and expect that to be compatible with serious literary endeavours. That's not what it's about.
Many manufacturers secretly question whether advertising really sells their product, but are vaguely afraid that their competitors might steal a march on them if they stopped.
The question is, can we make neural networks that are 1,000 times bigger? And how can we do that with existing computation?
No computer is ever going to ask a new, reasonable question. It takes trained people to do that.
What is the difference between a truly creative artist and an interpretive artist? I have not concluded anything about that, but it's fair to ask the question.
The philosophers Camus and Sartre raise the question whether or not a man can condemn himself.
The question is not really about a shift to the economic cone where officers are writing about the balance of payments and the need for economic stabilization.
Bluster, sputter, question, cavil; but be sure your argument be intricate enough to confound the court.
